PC World is Buza recently about how the laptop manufacturers try to compete with the Apple MacBook Air, which exploded in popularity since the introduction of the model in the third there in 2010. Fourth-Gen aktyalizasyon this year, it turns out the laptop, they should have in a year. For every laptop manufacturer is not called "Apple", the race for the new super-slim laptops and super-light. INTEL Ultrabooks calls, and the name is catching on, even though they were some kind of weird.
Here's a question for you: why not HP, Dell, Acer, Samsung, or any other major PC manufacturer to create an air Apple? Answer: They did. Sony X505 was on the verge notebooks weighing less than 2 kg, and it came out in 2003! Most recently, Dell Adamo introduced in 2009 and subsequent years, XPS Adamo even thinner. These laptops were sold. The cost of more than three Sony Grand. Dell also was too expensive, and battery life was miserable. Instead, to address these challenges, Dell killed the line Adamo. Sony and Dell to build more and produce a near-perfect critical and instead to challenge the engineers and designers to find ways to address the defects, they concluded that no one wanted these systems. Apple, do not give up, though. Drive too fat and too slow? Apple SSD commissioned a special case that can fit under its slim design. He worked as a seafood from smaller elements are more accessible, and killed as many lithium-polymer battery, as it could fit in the case. By 2010, there was air turned into overpriced, poor design of computer toys, they should be on you.
May point here is not just that the PC makers are quitting. The fact that they are completely wrong thinking that they should be built products. Several times a year, I have meetings with the major PC manufacturers on their product line further, and the tenor is always the same: "Our customers have told us is what they want, and market research said that this is what people are buying so that we have this product in your address, that the market "has nothing wrong with that, of course, but you will never be any tendency that way. If you want to make products that other people are comparing their products to you, you have to go outside the envelope. You have to take the risk and build something no one told us what they want because they know what they want it back, then you should invest in it and stick to it, until you get it. The paradox is that marketing departments are always trying to find the differentiation: ways to deliver their products, except for packaging. If every company is building products address set in the data market research, you're going to find differentiated products.
Assembling the best Air - or even just a cheaper one - is proving to be difficult. This is a solid aluminum chassis for MacBooks body really hard, despite the slim design, and Apple, which booked solid every round that can thread a body with a laptop in a single block of metal. The competition, like the Samsung 9 Series has a body made of metal, but without feeling stiff and field meet smoothly in a single image from one alloy cartridge. Naturally, the Series 9 is also quite expensive. If one of the main reasons that people do not buy a Mac in those days, because they can not buy for less than $ 1,000, the price of your Mac alternative is much higher that the price does not make you any favors.
Other places pretandan ultrabook come this fall. With ASUS UX51 and the Aspire 3951 the company Acer. It is rumored, HP will ultrabook shortly. What do all these systems have in common? They are too late. Thus, ultra-thin form factor, which has become a popular aircraft are growing in popularity and value the rights of some of these systems will be sold very well. Sales under № Although, they will suffer the fate they were also-RANS iyobl. They will "MacBook Air-like." The problem with your PC manufacturer that they can not build a computer as well as hot Apple, things are what they are still trying. Apple in the driver's seat.
If you aim at a target-to fast, you're sure you're in the back. Although HP, Acer, ASUS and others, caring about how to make killer MacBook Air, Apple is busy the rest of the line laptop rdefini with him. Intel is kicking in $ 300 million for control ultrabook categories and new inventions and new, more affordable SSDs will reduce costs. Since then, all PC makers to figure out how to make a laptop better than the market for a slim, lightweight and durable as the MacBook Air, everyone will be drooling over the new Apple MacBook will have just introduced. I guess we can not expect a lot of creativity and attention to companies who think that a random collection of letters and numbers into the appropriate product name.
Here's some free advice for PC manufacturers: the loss of the optical drive. No, not just in the next ultrabooks you, of all things. I asked four PC manufacturers this year, why do they always put a DVD-13 - 15-inch laptops while they are struggling to make a thin and light. They all say the same thing: "Our customers say that they are not ready for that yet." Of course not! If you wait until the world says, the optical drive should not compromise on thickness, weight and space for a larger battery, you'll be marketing a laptop as well as any other. I would bet millions of dollars in the next generation of MacBook Pro from Apple will not have an optical drive model 13 and 15 inches, and is so thin and delicate and light everyone will want one. Then, Dell, HP, Acer, ASUS, Samsung, Sony, and others will follow suit six months later, looking like they can not come up with the idea until after Apple does.
Here's another free idea: Make Netbooks half as thick as today. Intel Atom platform has advanced over the years, AMD has a fusion of the E-series chips, no optical drive, and the rest entèrn minimal at best. But the netbooks are still basically look like they did four years ago, when the genre was new. There's no good reason why a system of small, inexpensive, and what little power they have to be more than two-thirds of an inch thick.
Consider the history of the invention, Hewlett-Packard calculator in your pocket first, 35 hp in 1972. Marketing Research, HP says that they should not do in his release - he went to cost at least $ 350. Twenty times more expensive than the slide rule, no one was going to buy! Bill Hewlett said, "I do not care, I want one of these" and pushing the project in. It was so revolutionary, so vizyonè and transformation that even at $ 350 (in 1972 dollars!) More than 10,000 orders per month. HP will not project sales of 10,000 year. I do not know if HP or other laptop manufacturers still feel as though they are working with this kind of bold drive to build a mandatory product, and "damn the torpedoes," but it is certainly not evident in the products that we saw on the market Today:
Here's a question for you: why not HP, Dell, Acer, Samsung, or any other major PC manufacturer to create an air Apple? Answer: They did. Sony X505 was on the verge notebooks weighing less than 2 kg, and it came out in 2003! Most recently, Dell Adamo introduced in 2009 and subsequent years, XPS Adamo even thinner. These laptops were sold. The cost of more than three Sony Grand. Dell also was too expensive, and battery life was miserable. Instead, to address these challenges, Dell killed the line Adamo. Sony and Dell to build more and produce a near-perfect critical and instead to challenge the engineers and designers to find ways to address the defects, they concluded that no one wanted these systems. Apple, do not give up, though. Drive too fat and too slow? Apple SSD commissioned a special case that can fit under its slim design. He worked as a seafood from smaller elements are more accessible, and killed as many lithium-polymer battery, as it could fit in the case. By 2010, there was air turned into overpriced, poor design of computer toys, they should be on you.
May point here is not just that the PC makers are quitting. The fact that they are completely wrong thinking that they should be built products. Several times a year, I have meetings with the major PC manufacturers on their product line further, and the tenor is always the same: "Our customers have told us is what they want, and market research said that this is what people are buying so that we have this product in your address, that the market "has nothing wrong with that, of course, but you will never be any tendency that way. If you want to make products that other people are comparing their products to you, you have to go outside the envelope. You have to take the risk and build something no one told us what they want because they know what they want it back, then you should invest in it and stick to it, until you get it. The paradox is that marketing departments are always trying to find the differentiation: ways to deliver their products, except for packaging. If every company is building products address set in the data market research, you're going to find differentiated products.
Assembling the best Air - or even just a cheaper one - is proving to be difficult. This is a solid aluminum chassis for MacBooks body really hard, despite the slim design, and Apple, which booked solid every round that can thread a body with a laptop in a single block of metal. The competition, like the Samsung 9 Series has a body made of metal, but without feeling stiff and field meet smoothly in a single image from one alloy cartridge. Naturally, the Series 9 is also quite expensive. If one of the main reasons that people do not buy a Mac in those days, because they can not buy for less than $ 1,000, the price of your Mac alternative is much higher that the price does not make you any favors.
Other places pretandan ultrabook come this fall. With ASUS UX51 and the Aspire 3951 the company Acer. It is rumored, HP will ultrabook shortly. What do all these systems have in common? They are too late. Thus, ultra-thin form factor, which has become a popular aircraft are growing in popularity and value the rights of some of these systems will be sold very well. Sales under № Although, they will suffer the fate they were also-RANS iyobl. They will "MacBook Air-like." The problem with your PC manufacturer that they can not build a computer as well as hot Apple, things are what they are still trying. Apple in the driver's seat.
If you aim at a target-to fast, you're sure you're in the back. Although HP, Acer, ASUS and others, caring about how to make killer MacBook Air, Apple is busy the rest of the line laptop rdefini with him. Intel is kicking in $ 300 million for control ultrabook categories and new inventions and new, more affordable SSDs will reduce costs. Since then, all PC makers to figure out how to make a laptop better than the market for a slim, lightweight and durable as the MacBook Air, everyone will be drooling over the new Apple MacBook will have just introduced. I guess we can not expect a lot of creativity and attention to companies who think that a random collection of letters and numbers into the appropriate product name.
Here's some free advice for PC manufacturers: the loss of the optical drive. No, not just in the next ultrabooks you, of all things. I asked four PC manufacturers this year, why do they always put a DVD-13 - 15-inch laptops while they are struggling to make a thin and light. They all say the same thing: "Our customers say that they are not ready for that yet." Of course not! If you wait until the world says, the optical drive should not compromise on thickness, weight and space for a larger battery, you'll be marketing a laptop as well as any other. I would bet millions of dollars in the next generation of MacBook Pro from Apple will not have an optical drive model 13 and 15 inches, and is so thin and delicate and light everyone will want one. Then, Dell, HP, Acer, ASUS, Samsung, Sony, and others will follow suit six months later, looking like they can not come up with the idea until after Apple does.
Here's another free idea: Make Netbooks half as thick as today. Intel Atom platform has advanced over the years, AMD has a fusion of the E-series chips, no optical drive, and the rest entèrn minimal at best. But the netbooks are still basically look like they did four years ago, when the genre was new. There's no good reason why a system of small, inexpensive, and what little power they have to be more than two-thirds of an inch thick.
Consider the history of the invention, Hewlett-Packard calculator in your pocket first, 35 hp in 1972. Marketing Research, HP says that they should not do in his release - he went to cost at least $ 350. Twenty times more expensive than the slide rule, no one was going to buy! Bill Hewlett said, "I do not care, I want one of these" and pushing the project in. It was so revolutionary, so vizyonè and transformation that even at $ 350 (in 1972 dollars!) More than 10,000 orders per month. HP will not project sales of 10,000 year. I do not know if HP or other laptop manufacturers still feel as though they are working with this kind of bold drive to build a mandatory product, and "damn the torpedoes," but it is certainly not evident in the products that we saw on the market Today:
0 Comments: